{"id":18203,"date":"2022-01-26T09:12:55","date_gmt":"2022-01-26T08:12:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.munich-business-school.de\/insights\/?p=18203"},"modified":"2023-07-02T13:25:51","modified_gmt":"2023-07-02T11:25:51","slug":"sustainability-is-dead-make-room-for-regenerative-business","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.munich-business-school.de\/insights\/en\/2022\/sustainability-is-dead-make-room-for-regenerative-business\/","title":{"rendered":"Sustainability is Dead \u2013 Make Room for Regenerative Business"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Prof. Dr. Christian Schmidkonz explains why sustainability is no longer enough and why regenerative business is needed instead as the only form of future-oriented economic activity for real change.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

The limits of sustainable business<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Sustainability is an outdated concept. At least, it is for people and companies who truly want to make the world a better place. Ultimately, the idea of sustainable business has been subjected to such sustained degradation over the years that, today, sustainable business simply means maintaining a bad situation \u2013 and not actually helping to improve it. For far too long, we have been consuming more resources than can be naturally regenerated. Sustainable business effectively means that we continue to consume the natural resources of 1.7 Earths<\/a> every single year \u2013 rather than relying on the one Earth we all share.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is why outdoor clothing brand <\/em>Patagonia has removed the term sustainability<\/em> from its corporate vocabulary<\/a>. Other companies may decide to follow suit, as Patagonia has been a pioneer of environmentally conscious business in the clothing sector for many decades. It is with good reason that its founder, Yvon Chouinard, has inspired dozens of entrepreneurs around the world to remodel their companies as conscious businesses<\/a>, thereby acting in a more transparent, reflective, responsible and environmentally conscious manner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The need for a paradigm shift: from sustainable to regenerative business<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Today, any company truly committed to building a better future must work with a regenerative<\/em> focus. This involves a company not only avoiding damage to the environment but also repairing damage caused by business activities over recent centuries. Let\u2019s look at a few examples of companies who have already adopted regenerative business models (or are at least working hard to develop them). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Examples of regenerative businesses<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Ecosia – the search engine for tree planting<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The online search engine Ecosia<\/a> uses the majority of its ad revenues to fund tree-planting projects<\/a>. On average, it plants one tree every 50 searches. Given that a tree absorbs 50kg of CO2<\/sub> from the atmosphere over a lifespan of 15 years, this means that Ecosia users remove 1kg of CO2<\/sub> from the atmosphere with every search query<\/a>. The CO2<\/sub> emitted by operating its servers is negligible by comparison. In addition, because Ecosia relies on Bing for its search results \u2013 and Bing\u2019s provider, Microsoft, has announced its intention not only to become carbon neutral but to have removed all its historical CO2 <\/sub>emissions from the atmosphere by 2050<\/a> \u2013 Ecosia follows a genuinely regenerative business model. The company generates millions in profits every month and, as of the end of 2021, had used these yields to plant over 140,000,000 trees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Allbirds – sustainability of shoe soles<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Allbirds produces shoes using exclusively naturally materials such as wool and plant-based substances \u2013 save for the laces, which are made from recycled plastic. The soles are made from a material called SweetFoamTM<\/sup><\/a>, material based on sugarcane and produced in a carbon-negative process. In terms of the materials used, the more shoe soles are produced, the greater the impact in the fight against climate change. Allbirds underscores the fact that, if we are to achieve environmental goals, we must adopt regenerative agriculture<\/a> rather than the extensive use of conventional agricultural methods. Overall, each shoe produced still contributes to the rise in global CO2 <\/sub>levels \u2013 and Allbirds<\/em> transparently indicates exactly how many kilograms. And, even though the company offsets its CO2<\/sub> emissions<\/a>, Allbirds ultimately aims to stop producing CO2<\/sub> entirely and even become carbon-negative: \u201cWe intend to reverse climate change through better business.\u201d<\/a> Allbirds has also made the life cycle assessment (LCA) tool its uses to calculate its net CO2<\/sub> emissions freely available on its website<\/a> as open source software.
As it happens, Allbirds is not alone in providing such tools: Logitech also follows a reduce-renew-restore strategy<\/a> and publishes its LCA method<\/a> for interested parties to examine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Interface – CO2 negative carpet tiles<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

While Allbirds is still refining its approach, flooring manufacturer Interface<\/a> (annual turnover > USD\u00a01 billion), has already made it a reality. In 2020, it not only achieved carbon neutrality in production of all its flooring solutions, it even launched the world\u2019s first carbon-negative carpet tiles<\/a>. Back in 1994, Interface founder Ray C. Anderson set his company the goal of causing no further damage to the environment, taking the entire life cycle of carpet tiles<\/a> into consideration. Today, Interface has even achieved a negative carbon footprint in respect of the embodied carbon (cradle-to-gate) in its products. Consequently, the more of these carbon-negative carpet tiles are laid in offices around the world, the better it will be for the climate. Interface offsets operational carbon emissions (gate-to-end-of-life emissions) over which is has no influence through certification programs. It takes back all products at the end of their useful life and then puts them back into circulation. In describing its vision, Interface paints the picture of a Factory as a Forest<\/a><\/em> \u2013 meaning no smoke-belching chimneys and, rather than simply working sustainably, actually making a positive contribution to improving the environment (through regeneration).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These three examples demonstrate that adopting regenerative business models for commonplace products is possible and, in truth, the only honest objective for a future-focused, environmentally sound strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Differences in the approach and objectives of sustainable and regenerative business<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Sustainable Business<\/strong><\/td>Regenerative Business<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
„Do more with less harm\u201d<\/td> „Leave it better than you found it\u201d <\/td><\/tr>
Uses the resources of 1.7 Earths<\/td> Uses the resources of max. 1 Earth<\/td><\/tr>
Impact: Continued deterioration<\/td>Impact: Making a bad situation better<\/td><\/tr>
Climate-neutral production<\/td>Carbon-negative production<\/td><\/tr>
Overall effect: Neutral (at best)<\/td>Overall effect: Net improvement<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Environmental protection as self-protection<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Environmentalism doesn\u2019t mean that we<\/em> (i.e.\u00a0humans) should protect the environment<\/em> so that it<\/em> fares better. Instead, environmentalism means that we<\/em> can protect ourselves<\/em> by looking after the environment. There is no separation between us<\/em> (humans) and it<\/em> (the environment), as humanity can only survive in a healthy environment. Yet, as a result of industrialization, large parts of the environment are no longer healthy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In truth, the Earth really doesn\u2019t care whether humans live on it or not<\/a>. It existed for billions of years before the arrival of Homo sapiens<\/em><\/a> and it will still be here for billions of years to come \u2013 with or without humans. After all, the natural world has immense self-healing powers when humans do not intervene. Sir David Attenborough\u2019s film \u2018The Year Earth Changed\u2019<\/a> is a powerful demonstration of how quickly flora and fauna were able (re-)conquer habitats when a global pandemic forced humanity to retreat indoors, working and living from home. Nature does not need humans \u2013 but humans need nature to survive. Sustaining an unhealthy situation is not sufficient. Instead, pursuing regeneration to remedy the damage caused to the planet must become the main paradigm for modern entrepreneurship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recommended reading:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n